security & trust
2 TopicsStability vs. Features: The Unique Philosophy of Chrome OS
Hello, There is a distinct difference in how Google manages Android versus Chrome OS, and as a developer, I think it is important to recognize why the Chrome OS strategy is superior for productivity. The Android Approach: Android is a commercial product first. It focuses on features, consumer appeal, and running on everything. The priority is "It works now." The Chrome OS Approach: Chrome OS started small and humble. It has grown slowly, not by chasing trends, but by building a foundation of trust and robustness. I see this robustness daily in the Crostini environment. Recently, upgrading my VM from Debian 12 (Bookworm) to Debian 13 (Trixie) was a pleasure—a real upgrade requiring no reinstallation. This level of stability is rare in the OS world. It proves that Chrome OS is engineered with a long-term vision of quality. The Risk The current rumors about new operating systems or "Android on PC" threaten to undermine this stability. If Google tries to make Chrome OS behave too much like Android—rushing features at the cost of stability—we lose the "high quality" segment. My Request Chrome OS is currently the best bridge between desktop computing and Android mobile development. I urge Google to maintain this "slow and steady" strategy. We don't need a flashy OS; we need a trustable one. Keep building the high-quality, robust platform that Chrome OS has become.Solved43Views0likes1CommentBest practices for deploying WireGuard VPN across managed ChromeOS devices (system-wide or via Admin Console)
Hello, We currently manage a growing fleet of ChromeOS devices (Chromebooks and Chromeboxes) through our Google Workspace domain. All devices are enrolled, updated to the latest ChromeOS version, and centrally configured via the Admin Console. Our VPN of choice is WireGuard, which ChromeOS now supports natively. We followed Google’s official documentation to configure WireGuard per user: Configure VPNs on ChromeOS (Google Support) The challenge we are running into is scalability: configuring WireGuard individually on a per-user basis is becoming increasingly tedious as our organization grows. Ideally, we would like to achieve one of the following: - System-wide tunnel setup - Assign a WireGuard key per device, rather than per user. This would allow the VPN configuration to apply regardless of who logs into the machine. - Admin Console integration - Ability to push or preconfigure WireGuard VPN settings (similar to how Wi-Fi networks or other VPN types can be managed centrally). From what I understand, the Admin Console allows pushing some network settings, but WireGuard does not currently appear as a supported option. We also explored the possibility of using an Android VPN app as a workaround. However, the Android subsystem seems to create its own isolated IP pool, which breaks certain use cases for us — e.g., we need internal VPN IP addresses for DNS resolution and internal resource access, which doesn’t work properly when tunneled through the Android environment. So my questions are: Is there currently any way to enforce or distribute WireGuard VPN configurations via the Admin Console? If not, is there a recommended workaround to achieve system-wide VPN coverage (device-level rather than user-level)? More generally, what is the best practice for deploying WireGuard in centrally-managed ChromeOS environments today? I realize WireGuard support on ChromeOS is still relatively new and limited to certain devices, but we’ve been using it successfully with most of our devices. We’re just looking for the most scalable and officially supported way to roll this out across our managed devices. Thanks in advance for any insights!185Views0likes4Comments