The "Enable ADB Debugging" Maze: A Call for Architectural Clarity, Unified Nomenclature, and UI Improvements

Hello Chrome OS Enterprise Community and Google Product Team,

I am an administrator and developer using a managed Chromebook for Android development. For over a month, I have been unable to toggle "Enable ADB debugging" in the Linux (Crostini) settings because it remains grayed out, despite my having full admin access.

After weeks of back-and-forth with Google Workspace Support, it has become clear that this is not just a bug, but a profound architectural issue regarding how managed Chrome OS handles policy dependencies and how we navigate the Admin Console.

Technical Environment & Stability Context
It is important to note that my development environment is not a fresh install, but a long-running, stable workspace. I have been using the same Crostini container for over a year, and recently performed a successful dist-upgrade from Debian 12 (Bookworm) to Debian 13 (Trixie), which is the current Stable release.

The fact that Crostini handled this major OS upgrade without requiring a reinstall demonstrates the high quality and robustness of the Chrome OS platform. However, this longevity raises a diagnostic question: Is the ADB toggle logic failing specifically on containers that have migrated through major versions?

The Current Situation: A Maze of Hidden Dependencies
Support has provided numerous potential fixes, suggesting that the "ADB" feature is not controlled by one switch, but is the result of a complex calculation involving multiple policies scattered across different menus.

I have re-checked all the following solutions proposed by Support between Nov 7 and Dec 11, 2025. None have solved the issue:

The Architectural Problem
Administrators are currently guessing which combination of "User Settings" and "Device Settings" will result in the feature unlocking. There is no visibility into which specific policy is overriding the others. Furthermore, the UI itself makes locating these settings inefficient.

Proposal 1: A "Computed Policy View"
We need a diagnostic view in the console. When an Admin looks at a locked setting (like ADB Debugging), the console should display:

• Status: LOCKED
• Blocked By: Device Policy > ADB Sideloading OR User Affiliation Check Failed.

Proposal 2: A Standardized Nomenclature for Admin Options
The Google Admin Console contains thousands of options. Support tickets often fail because describing the path to an option is tedious and prone to error. I propose implementing a Unique Identifier System:

• Menus/Tabs: assigned a 3-letter nickname.
• Sections/Options: assigned a numerical ID.

Example: Instead of describing a long path, we could simply reference ID: DEV-CHR-DEV-VMS-042

• DEV: Menu (Devices)
• CHR: Product (Chrome)
• DEV: Tab (Device Settings)
• VMS: Section (Virtual Machines)
• 042: Option (ADB Sideloading)

Entering this ID into the search bar should take the admin directly to the specific toggle.

Proposal 3: Collapsible Sections (Fold/Unfold UI)
Currently, settings pages (like Users & browsers) are massive vertical lists. To reach a section near the bottom, an admin must scroll past hundreds of irrelevant options in previous sections. Even when using the "search on page" function, the visual clutter is overwhelming.

I propose adding a Fold/Unfold feature:

• A "Collapse All / Expand All" button at the top of the settings page.
• Clickable section headers that allow us to hide large blocks of settings we are not currently editing.

Conclusion
We cannot manage what we cannot find or understand. The current "trial and error" approach to enabling standard developer features is hindering adoption in the enterprise sector. We need better mapping, a precise language (nomenclature), and a more efficient UI to navigate this complex environment.

Best regards,
Christophe Roux