security
67 TopicsGoogle Messages App: SMS to shortcode not able to send
Our Provider (Vodafone Germany) is using a SMS shortcode number to be able to order an upgrade on dataplans by sms. Once the monthly contract plan (e.g. 1 GB) have been used users will receive a sms from 70997 to inform that you can answer the SMS with "1" or "2" to restore your data connectivity. We ran into the issue that the Google Messages app seems to have some sort of bug with sending SMS to this kind of shortcode number as it alway says "Not sent" in red error text. Provider tech support told me that the Google messages app is prefixing the number with "49" resulting in a wrong / unknown number (4970997). They cannot fix that from their side as the issue is within Google messages app and asked me to install a 3rd party messages app.... *ugly* Is this something I can request to investigate from here? I will also create a case with Samsung tech support as we are mainly using Samsung devices as our corp. device fleet. Thank you! Kind Regards DanielSolved283Views0likes9CommentsDPC Extras issues
Hello, I hope you're doing well. I'm reaching out for assistance on an issue I'm experiencing with DPC extras on ZTE devices. Is there a method to implement DPC extras without using a QR code? It appears that even when configuring ZTE with DPC extras, some functionalities do not activate. Additionally, several design elements seem less than optimal. For instance, if you do not use a QR code before selecting the language—which, ideally, should be sourced from the DPC—there's an option presented to transfer data from another device. This option seems inappropriate for a company-owned device. Could this be improved? The next screen prompts a WiFi connection. Using a QR code skips this step, but users still need to manually confirm the WiFi connection. Could this be streamlined? Is it possible to enroll a device as an admin, reset it, and have the DPC extras from the QR code persist on the device until it connects to WiFi and verifies its management status? It seems everyone is adding devices to ZTE for security reasons, particularly for stolen devices, yet the reliance on QR codes adds unnecessary complexity. Could this process be made more user-friendly?41Views0likes2CommentsIntune - Cannot change screen lock timeout
Hello community, I'm writing this post 'cause I'm facing a strange issue with the lock screen setting on our AE devices managed from Intune. The configuration policy was created by my predecessor years ago, and was configured for lock teh screen after one minute. Everything working and all happy. Then I got the request for create an exception group for that, and everything I tried failed. I tried to change the global policy to 5 mins, but it did not worked, and the maximum lock screen time is still one minute. Also remove the setting at all and left it Not Configured didn't had any effect. Then I tried to disable One Lock. With this I was able to change the system lock screen settings but on Settings - Security and Privacy - More Security Settings - Work Profile Security - Use one lock I cannot set anything longer than one minute. Pretty sure this is coming from somewhere in Intune, but also involving Microsoft and sending them the verbose logs wasn't enough. Did any of you ever encountered a similar issue and found a solution? Many thanks in advance for everyone that will try to help.98Views0likes7CommentsAssistance with Domain Already Linked to Android Enterprise
hello, I attempted to set up Android Enterprise using a Gmail account, but received a message saying, "This domain name has already been used." Could you please help me verify which Android Enterprise account is currently associated with our domain and advise on how I can proceed?40Views0likes1CommentTech Newbie interested in mobile cyber security, after multiple hacking events, seeking suggestions, tips, advice etc, to get involved.
Hello All, I am looking for advice, tips, suggestions, or helpful info, to begin a career/ journey into the world of Mobile Cyber Security and Tech. My interest was sparked after multiple hacking events that were very damaging to my life, my digital life, my work life, my relationships, my mental, physical, and emotional health, my data, information, and intellectual property of my business, and more. Now I am being pulled to learn how to protect myself first, and second so that I may be able to help others. I guess Ethical Hacking is the term. Any info helps. Thank you, Androidc3po46Views0likes2CommentsPlay Protect Blocking Custom DPC Apps — How to Get Approval or Alternatives?
Hi everyone, I'm a developer who helps enterprises build custom DPC (Device Policy Controller) Reference Documentation apps to manage Android devices based on their unique requirements. Recently, Play Protect has started blocking the installation of custom DPC apps, even when these apps are signed and used internally. The warning claims the app may pose a risk due to access to sensitive data - even though it's strictly for enterprise use. To make things more difficult: Google is no longer accepting registration of custom DPC apps with Android Enterprise, which limits official distribution and management options. Android Management APIs don’t support all use cases, and also have quote limit. I’ve applied twice to join the Android Enterprise portal to build a SaaS-based device management platform, but both requests were rejected without a clear reason. My questions for the community: Is there any official way to get a custom DPC app approved or whitelisted by Play Protect? Are there any alternative ways to manage Android devices at scale (outside of AMAPI or legacy EMM)? How can new developers or startups gain access to Android Enterprise features when onboarding is currently restricted? Any help, direction, or shared experience would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, KulwinderSolved656Views4likes16CommentsIs there any way to disable Google Play Protect (GPP) from an EMM or to otherwise whitelist apps from scanning?
I am very concerned about the Enhanced GPP features coming soon that are currently being piloted in other regions. https://security.googleblog.com/2023/10/enhanced-google-play-protect-real-time.html This is not a welcome feature whatsoever for the fully managed space where we have business apps written internally that are being installed on business devices, owned by that business. In no way do we want Google sitting in between deciding whether a very legitimate app written internally for an organization should be installed on devices that are purchased and owned by the same organization on fully managed devices. I would like a way to disable GPP completely, or at a minimum whitelist applications from scanning as we don't want Google interfering in the business operations. GPP is a helpful consumer protection features but fully managed devices should have the ability to be opted in or out of the program. Otherwise GPP can incorrectly flag a mission critical app and disable or remove it from a device, thereby bringing down a line-of-business application and an end customers operations. While the intentions of GPP are good, by blocking business apps Google themselves is becoming the malicious actor that GPP is ironically trying. to prevent.Solved40KViews17likes58CommentsWhat security threats do you experience the most?
Hey everyone, Stop what you’re doing - episode 2 of The Secure Element is out now! Tune in as Bigdogburr and Theresa Lanowitz, Chief Cybersecurity Evangelist at LevelBlue, dive into achieving cyber resilience in an era of boundaryless computing. Their discussion truly reinforced for me just how vital a holistic approach to securing all end-user computing is - from laptops to mobiles, and everything in between - especially with cyberattacks becoming so sophisticated. The role AI plays in crafting these increasingly targeted attacks was a real eye-opener! This episode got me thinking about the real-world threats we’re all facing. What are the kinds of cyber threats you are most confronted with? Cast your vote in the comment section below: Phishing / Quishing/ Smishing (Email, SMS, or QR code tricks) Deepfakes (Convincing fake video/ voice calls) Malicious apps (Apps designed to steal data/ compromise devices) Network attacks (Rogue or Spoofed Wi-Fi, man in the middle, etc.) Other (please share more details in the comments!) And share some wisdom! Do you have some tips on how to identify a cyber attack? If you’ve been targeted, what’s one key lesson learned that you think everyone should hear? Looking forward to reading your stories. Chat soon, Emilie258Views1like20CommentsImpact of Intune's NFC restriction setting on IC card reading and Nearby Share
Hello, I'm managing Android Enterprise devices via Intune and would like to confirm the behavior of a specific device restriction setting related to NFC. ■ Device: AQUOS wish4 (Android), enrolled as a fully managed device ■ Policy applied: Device configuration profile with "Beam data using NFC (work-profile level)" set to Block ■ Policy configuration path in Intune Admin Center: Microsoft Intune Admin Center > Devices > Manage devices > Configuration Platform: Android Enterprise Profile type: Template > Device restrictions Configuration settings > General - Beam data using NFC (work-profile level): Block ○ Background and expectation: My understanding is that this setting is intended to block NFC-based data transfer (i.e., Android Beam) within the work profile. However, I initially assumed it might also block general NFC usage, such as reading contactless transit cards or using mobile wallet services. ○ Test scenario and results: After applying the policy to a fully managed AQUOS wish4 device, I observed the following: The NFC toggle remains available and functional under: Settings > Connection settings > More connection settings > NFC I installed an app that reads contactless transit cards used for public transportation (e.g., Suica or PASMO in Japan) and confirmed that it successfully retrieved the card balance via NFC ○ Interpretation: Based on this behavior, I suspect that the policy only affects the deprecated Android Beam feature, which used NFC for peer-to-peer file sharing. It does not block general NFC functionality such as card reading or mobile payments, nor does it impact newer sharing technologies like Nearby Share or Quick Share, which rely on Bluetooth and Wi-Fi Direct. ■ Questions: Is my understanding correct that "Beam data using NFC (work-profile level)" only restricts Android Beam functionality and does not affect general NFC usage? Is there a way to restrict Nearby Share / Quick Share on fully managed Android devices via Intune, or would that require a different configuration or approach? Any insights, documentation references, or shared experiences would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!131Views0likes3Comments