Support for a Single VPN Instance Shared Across All Users on a Corporate-Owned Device
Hello everyone, I am exploring how to reduce resource usage on corporate-owned Android devices that are configured with multiple users or profiles. Currently, Android's VPN framework is per-user: Each user (or work profile) maintains its own VPN state. An Always-On VPN can only be configured within the context of the current user or profile. This means that if a device has several users, each user needs to run a separate VPN instance. This design results in unnecessary duplication: Multiple VPN processes or tunnels are active on the same device. System resources (CPU, battery, memory) are consumed redundantly. The VPN app itself must be installed and configured multiple times. My request/idea: Enable a single VPN instance at the device level (not just per-user), so that one VPN tunnel can secure network traffic across all users and profiles. This would: Greatly reduce resource waste. Simplify deployment and management for IT admins. Prevent the need for each user or profile to maintain its own VPN connection. Questions for the community and Google team: Is there any existing mechanism (documented or OEM-specific) that allows a VPN to operate at the device scope rather than user scope? Are there any roadmap plans to support device-level VPN in Android Enterprise? If not currently supported, could this be considered as a feature request for future Android versions? This would be particularly valuable for dedicated devices and shared device scenarios where multiple users must access corporate resources, but IT only wants to maintain one VPN tunnel. Looking forward to your insights and to hear whether others face the same challenge. Thank you.
Unlinking Zero Touch Account from deleted Enterprise
Hi, we are currently trialing automatic device enrollment using a Zero Touch Account and baramundi Management Suite as our EMM solution. It all worked well, until I deleted the Android Enterprise account before unlinking it from our Zero Touch account. When I now try to create a new enterprise and link it to our Zero Touch account, it says that it's already linked and I can't proceed to the actual Zero Touch console within the iFrame in the EMM. Sadly I can't change the display language for the iframe. It says "Choose accounts to be linked" and the light grey part next to the checkbox says "already linked". I'm only presented the option to go back and choose another Google account. There doesn't appear to be an option on the web portal version of Zero Touch (https://enterprise.google.com/android/zero-touch/customers/) to unlink the enterprise either. When I try to delete the enterprise it warns me to unlink the Zero Touch account before proceeding and tells me that all enterprise related data will be deleted after 30 days. So my question is: Is there another way to unlink the enterprise from the Zero Touch Account or do I simply wait for 30 days and then the link is deleted automatically? Peter
Seeing spike in HARDWARE_BACKED_EVALUATION_FAILED for Android 16 devices.
We are seeing a spike in HARDWARE_BACKED_EVALUATION_FAILED in https://developers.google.com/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices#securityrisk field in AMA Device response. We are seeing this mostly in the Android 16 customers and for some users it went away without any change on their side. So it does not seem anything wrong with the devices and seems random. Anyone else facing this with AMA or play integrity?
Google Keyboard configuration Intune
Hi, I would like to know how to configure the Google Keyboard using Microsoft Intune. Specifically, I need to set up the keyboard with dual language support (Italian and German) on my Android devices managed through Intune. Could anyone help me achieve this goal?
SCEP and EAP/TLS
Hi Team, I'm so sorry to ask this but it is expected that whenever I select the SSID of a Wi-Fi network that contains a SCEP and EAP/TLS configuration, it will show a popup example below? The policy for SCEP and EAP/TLS are already being configured by third-party MDM and we just assume that we don't need to do this manually on each devices.Application report not getting collected on Xiaomi mix fold devices
We have couple of users who have the Xiaomi Fold device and in the application report section of status report notifications we are only getting the android device policy app. None of the other applications are getting returned. Is this a known issue? How can we debug the issue? I was not able to see anything obvious in the device logs. We are getting the full application report for the other devices.
Is there an alternative way to perform the same function as UpdateApplication on Android 15?
Hi everyone, We are currently managing Samsung enterprise devices via Knox Manage under Android Enterprise DA mode (Device Admin) . Our in-house application previously used the UpdateApplication API to update itself silently without user interaction. This worked well under Android 14. However, after updating to Android 15, this API no longer functions. Based on the Samsung Knox SDK documentation, it appears that UpdateApplication is now restricted to Device Owner (DO) and Profile Owner (PO) apps. We have tried to assign all delegated scopes to our app via Knox Manage policy settings (Android Enterprise → App Restrictions → Delegated Scopes for Apps). Unfortunately, the API call still fails. ✅ What we’re looking for: - Is there any alternative methods that allows silent or managed updates of enterprise apps on Android 15, without being a DO/PO app? - Or is DO/PO elevation now the only viable path? - If so, is there an official onboarding flow or protocol to request DO/PO designation for an app via Knox Manage? Any guidance, references, or examples would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! — Environment: - Android 15 - Knox Manage (latest) - Samsung A9+ tablets - Device Admin mode
Zero Touch Portal - Error Message
Hi Team, I have created a new configuration item and linked it to Microsoft Intune token. Then I have decided to remove the Intune token configuration before removing the configuration file from Zero touch (which I dont think it should matter). Then I went to remove the configuration item from Zero touch and was getting a strange error message, see below. Now I'm left with a configuration item in Zero touch that I can't remove. Can someone please help or reach out, that would be great. Also, let me know if there is anything else you require from my end.
