12 deliveries of AE-mas (What shipped in Android Enterprise in 2025)
2025 was a big year for Android Enterprise. This was the year several long-missed features finally landed, Device Trust became a thing, zero-touch got a compliance and audit boost, provisioning saw a revamp, and the Android Management API quietly kept adding the sort of controls that make admins' lives easier. So, in the spirit of celebrating a strong year for the platform, here are 12 Features of AE-mas (let's not worry about the title.. I was strugglin'), in no particular order, chosen somewhat at random as - would you believe - the list could have been longer should I have chosen not to follow the 12 days of Christmas as the theme.. 12. APN overrides via AMAPI APN management finally arrived. In May 2025, AMAPI gained apnPolicy, allowing admins to define and enforce APNs directly through policy. This closes a long-standing gap for cellular deployments where “just set the APN” has historically been anything but. It's great to see this functionality pulled out of OEM config and into the AMAPI layer, giving admins access to on-device APIs that have been effectively off-limits for years. Read about APN here. 11. Developer verification for Android Developer verification isn't coming until next year, but we're talking about it already, and work is in progress to bring it to fruition now. Developer verification raises the bar for Play publishers by requiring stronger identity verification. For enterprise, it’s a supply-chain win: fewer convincing lookalikes, higher friction for malicious publishers, and a clearer answer when security teams ask “who made this app, exactly?”. There’s pushback in the community, there's a lot of misunderstandings about the requirements and ramifications, but hopefully as time goes on this will settle on both sides through further transparency and discussion. Organisations deploying private apps to their own tenants are currently exempt, but it remains a big change nonetheless, and organisations benefit from the wider boost in authenticity of apps and developers. I covered off more about developer approval here. 10. Device Trust from Android Enterprise This was the year Device Trust arrived. Device Trust enables real-time posture and integrity signals (Play Integrity verdicts, boot state, security patch recency, lock-screen presence, strong auth age, OS tamper signals) that can be evaluated continuously rather than only at enrolment, and on both managed and unmanaged devices. It's a huge boost for MAM-type deployments, security solutions, and allows traditionally EMM-dependent vendors the freedom to operate independently. This isn’t a small feature. It fundamentally changes how Android Enterprise fits into modern security architectures. I wrote more about Device Trust here. 9. Custom app management via AMAPI (CUSTOM install type) One of the most consequential releases of the year, perhaps even since AMAPI began half a decade ago. AMAPI introduced first-class support for installing and managing custom applications using installType: CUSTOM, backed by signing certificate validation (appSigningKeyFingerprints) and explicit install and uninstall commands. It allows organisations reliant on line-of-business (LOB) internal applications to ditch any and all wild-west sideloading for a policy-driven, verifiable deployment, which is exactly what enterprise actually needs. All without the need for uploading apps to Google Play. I wrote more about custom apps here. 8. Zero-touch portal audit logs and admin roles The zero-touch portal became auditable and permission-scoped in 2025. Google rolled out audit logs to the zero-touch customer portal, capturing all admin actions needed to ensure the platform is no longer a black hole of who did what. Alongside this came clearer admin role separation, reducing the blast radius of operational mistakes. For regulated environments, this turned zero-touch from a black box into something governance teams could actually trust. 7. Android 16 provisioning improvements One of the greatest improvements to the enrolment flow happened in 2025, and it was so long overdue! Android 16 brought a clear push toward more reliable setup flows, fewer steps, and the ability to update it on the fly, as opposed to being stuck adjusting it only on major version releases. I put out a video nearer the start of the year, while 16 was still in beta, which you can see on LinkedIn here. With this newer approach, Google is beginning to leave behind the old managed provisioning flows baked into AOSP, though they're still there as a fallback today. It'll be interesting to see how this evolves. 6. Application roles in Android Management API This was unexpected. Application Roles formalised entire classes of enterprise apps, including: COMPANION_APP KIOSK MOBILE_THREAT_DEFENSE_ENDPOINT_DETECTION_RESPONSE SYSTEM_HEALTH_MONITORING Apps assigned these roles can be exempt from background execution limits, power management, suspension, and hibernation on modern Android versions, with user control restricted by default. This isn’t just about companion apps - it’s about enterprise software finally being treated as first-class by the OS, and adds much-needed flexibility with far less configuration and overhead. 5. Default application management policy Admins finally gained control over default apps. AMAPI added a policy allowing admins to define a prioritised list of default applications per app type (browser, dialler, etc), setting the first qualifying app as default and preventing user changes. For compliance-sensitive fleets - browsers, diallers, PDF viewers - this is the sort of boring control that saves hours. It's predominantly Android 16+, but there's a few that go back a few versions of Android. Read more about default applications here. 4. RCS archival RCS has long been the compliance blind spot for Android Enterprise fleets, with SMS/MMS archiving handled by legacy tools while RCS was left out in the cold. In December, Google release a supported way to archive RCS/SMS/MMS on fully managed devices, with Google Messages as the mandated client. Once those prerequisites are met, admins can configure Messages to forward message bodies, metadata, and attachments to a SIEM/service/archival tool on a schedule or trigger with no needed workarounds or limitations of legacy solutions. It’s - to reiterate - Google Messages only for now (OEM messaging apps remain out of scope unless they add their own support), but it gives regulated orgs a sanctioned retention path for rich messaging at last. It has been met with quite a bit of mixed feelings, and even more FUD. I go into more detail about RCS archiving here. 3. App functions and cross-profile controls Android 16 brought app-to-app interaction under policy control. New settings allow admins to govern whether apps can expose app functions, and whether personal-profile apps can invoke functions exposed by work-profile apps, bringing finer control to cross-profile linking scenarios. Niche, but powerful for when this functionality takes off in enterprise workflows. 2. Android App Bundle (AAB) support in the Managed Play iframe This finally removed a long-standing enterprise limitation. In March 2025, Android App Bundle uploads became supported in the Managed Google Play iframe. Private apps finally gained parity with public Play distribution, including split APK delivery and more efficient installs. I wrote more about AAB here. 1. Android’s accelerated platform release cadence The change that underpins everything above. Android is shifting toward more frequent platform releases, with Android 16 landing far earlier than usual and signalling a broader move away from a single annual cadence. Harder to track? Maybe. I'm having a lot more fun poking around the Android Canary builds looking for unreleased functionality than I do sleuthing around AOSP code, though! Better for shipping enterprise capability without waiting a full year? Also yes. Signing off Android Enterprise levelled up across the board in 2025. From trust and supply-chain integrity to app management and provisioning improvements, the team set the bar really high this year. Let's hope the momentum continues in 2026! Which of these made the biggest difference for you this year, and what are you hoping lands in 2026? Happy holidays and here’s to a wonderful New Year!
Enable ADB debugging is grayed out - This setting is managed by your administrator
This issue was documented in 2021 but with no solution. My Chromebook is managed by my company and I am the manager. But Google tries to find the managed option to unlock for this to work in the administration interface for more than 15 days without success. By the way there are thousands of options in the admin interface it could be a clever feature to number them. If you are in front of the same issue please add your comments to this post. I hope that Google support will succeed to solve the issue soon because I developed my first app for Android on my Chromebook with Android Studio and I was able to download it to my phone before these 15 days.Tech Newbie interested in mobile cyber security, after multiple hacking events, seeking suggestions, tips, advice etc, to get involved.
Hello All, I am looking for advice, tips, suggestions, or helpful info, to begin a career/ journey into the world of Mobile Cyber Security and Tech. My interest was sparked after multiple hacking events that were very damaging to my life, my digital life, my work life, my relationships, my mental, physical, and emotional health, my data, information, and intellectual property of my business, and more. Now I am being pulled to learn how to protect myself first, and second so that I may be able to help others. I guess Ethical Hacking is the term. Any info helps. Thank you, Androidc3po
EOL Status of OpenCensus Jars and Request for Migration
During a recent review, we noticed that some of the Android Enterprise dependencies we use — specifically opencensus-api and opencensus-contrib-http-util — have not been updated for several years. --> Last release: 0.31.1 (April 29, 2022) These libraries are currently required as dependencies for google-http-client.jar, which we use to initialize HTTP clients for API calls. If we exclude the OpenCensus jars, the application fails at runtime with missing class errors. Therefore, these jars are currently mandatory for successful execution. However, from a security perspective, our central security team does not allow bundling outdated or unsupported dependencies. We would appreciate your guidance on the following points: Are there any plans to update or refactor google-http-client.jar to remove or upgrade its dependency on the legacy OpenCensus libraries? Is there an alternative approach or supported path to use OpenTelemetry (or any other supported telemetry library) in place of OpenCensus for tracing and metrics? We already raised in following portals and no update received, so posting it here AE Partner Escalations Git hub discussions Expert Forum Any roadmap updates or migration guidance would be extremely helpful.Do certifications matter when researching new devices?
Hey everyone, Episode 3 of The Secure Element went live last month! Bigdogburr (our go-to security expert) sat down with Brian Wood from Google’s Device Security and Privacy team to unpack how devices get approved for use in the US federal government. Spoiler: it’s not simple! From government-approved labs running tests, to annual re-certifications, to the role of NIAP (National Information Assurance Partnership) — there’s a lot going on behind the scenes to make sure devices are truly secure and trustworthy. When you’re looking at new devices, do you pay attention to security certifications or accreditations? If so, what certifications are you most interested in your region? Or do you focus on something else entirely? Let me know your thoughts below — I’d love to hear how you approach this! Chat soon, Emilie
Intermittent QR Code Provisioning Failures with Identical Source Code
I am experiencing inconsistent behavior with QR code provisioning for Android Enterprise and am seeking guidance from the community. The Issue: QR code provisioning works intermittently, but the failure pattern is inconsistent. A provisioning QR code generated from a specific APK build will work reliably. However, subsequent builds of the exact same source code from the same Android Studio project will sometimes fail. The device displays a generic "Contact your IT admin" error. What I've Verified: The APK is properly signed and the checksum in the QR code is correct. The server delivers the APK with the correct application/vnd.android.package-archive MIME type. The DeviceAdminReceiver is correctly declared in the manifest and the associated XML resource exists. The package name and component name in the QR code are 100% accurate. Comparing a "working" APK and a "failing" APK in APK Analyzer shows no differences in the core components (package name, receivers, resources). Question: Has anyone else encountered this? Are there known issues with Android's provisioning service being sensitive to certain aspects of the APK build output that are not related to the core functionality or signature? Any insight into how to achieve consistent, reproducible builds for provisioning would be greatly appreciated.
