[Day 3] Dedicated to Dedicated: Non-negotiables for EMM/MDM in Rugged Android Deployments
Disclaimer: The following article captures the opinion of Matt Dermody, Senior Director of Enterprise Mobility at Manhattan Associates. The stances contained within are a reflection of Manhattan's specific focus on line-of-business Android devices, built on years of being "Dedicated to Dedicated." Background Manhattan Associates is a B2B software company specifically focused on best-in-class, line-of-business enterprise deployments of enterprise software such as Warehouse Management (WMS), Transportation Management (TMS), and Point-of-Sale (POS). These software deployments command high expectations of uptime and availability, and that ultimately encompasses the complete solution, including the mobile computers that the software runs on. Manhattan is dedicated to ensuring that our end customers have the best possible experience, and that involves ensuring that the dedicated devices running our software are also properly maintained and supported. Google defines a "dedicated device" as a company-owned device that is fully managed and locked down for a specific work purpose, often using a single app or a small set of apps. These devices are restricted from personal use and are used for business functions like point-of-sale systems, inventory scanners, or digital signage. Or in other words, all of the device types that Manhattan sells, deploys, and supports alongside our software solutions. In that sense, I guess it can be said that we are… Dedicated to Dedicated. Managing rugged, line-of-business Android devices is not the same as managing BYOD phones and laptops. These are mission-critical endpoints running specialized apps in warehouses, stores, yards, and DCs—downtime costs money and local IT is increasingly rare. Your EMM/MDM must control versions, files, firmware, and field support with precision. Anything less adds risk and operational drag. Situation Imagine having to explain to a CIO that a business-critical mobile app has automatically upgraded to a new version that breaks functionality, and there is no easy rollback available. Here is a preview of how that might look. That situation is all too common but can be prevented with the right EMM/MDM strategies. The mere thought of that possible situation keeps the Manhattan team up at night. We have spent years developing strategies to add predictability and stability into enterprise device deployments to prevent bad situations from ever happening. Philosophies & Strategies Here is a preview of some of the core philosophies surrounding Manhattan’s tailored approach to managing mission-critical device deployments. Some of these might be controversial, but these are the strategies that work for us. 1. App Distribution and Version Discipline Rigorous version control of enterprise apps—stage, canary, bulk rollout, and rollback—is a must. Rugged ops cannot afford “surprise” app updates or version creep. If you can’t downgrade quickly, you don’t control your risk surface. An EMM/MDM should offer direct installation of private APKs on fully managed devices. Auto-upgrades to the “latest only” through Managed Google Play can lead to instability and version drift. Look for a console that can deploy specific app builds to specific groups on your schedule. If your tool can’t install an APK directly onto devices, it’s the wrong tool for rugged. Period. You must target different versions/configs by environment—Stage, QA, Prod—often per site group. That includes app versions, config files, etc. 2. File Management for App and Scanner Configuration LoB apps often externalize key settings via JSON and similar external config files. For example, Zebra DataWedge uses .db files placed in a specific auto-import directory to control mission-critical scanner settings. Your EMM must place, update, and replace these files on demand and at scale—ideally without anyone touching a device. Emergency changes (host cutover, DNS rename, scanner tweak) should be a file push away, not an onsite scramble. 3. Remote Control and Log Retrieval Treat full-fidelity Remote Control as table stakes. Support must see what the user sees, drive the screen, and pull logs and files in one session. Anything “view only” or bolt-on only erodes speed to resolution. Relying on reports from the floor or grainy pictures of an error taken from another device are not sufficient tactics for troubleshooting mission-critical device deployments. When issues hit, you don’t want an insurance policy like Remote Control that can be used to quickly diagnose and test solutions; you want a tool. An EMM admin without Remote Control is effectively blind with their hands tied behind their back. 4. OEM-level Controls (Zebra/Honeywell) There are numerous configuration settings that enterprise-grade OEMs extend beyond the baseline Android Enterprise configuration APIs. These OEMs are generally years ahead of what is available in base Android from a configurability standpoint and often introduce configuration settings that may otherwise never arrive to the base OS. These granular configuration layers ultimately are what set enterprise-class devices apart from consumer-grade technology. It is therefore imperative that an EMM managing these devices has the capability to manage OEM configuration extension features directly. For Zebra, this involves execution of their MX XML, DataWedge behavior, button mapping, radios, and other rugged-specific controls—through native profiles or integrated mechanisms. OEMConfig is useful, especially for parity across EMMs, but you will hit practical limits in closed networks and with Play-dependent timing/visibility. OEMConfig is a lowest-common-denominator functionality that was designed as a bridge to enable limited AMAPI-aligned EMMs to manage OEM-level settings with the limited tools at their disposal. Your EMM should support both OEMConfig (at a bare minimum) and offer the flexibility of direct MX/file workflows so you’re not boxed in by the limitations of distributing device settings through a complex web of Google Play server infrastructure. Your EMM should offer the ability to manage settings directly on the devices it manages, without the added layers and black boxes of complexity. 5. Firmware and Security Patching Over-the-Air (OTA) upgrades are great, but only when the EMM admin is in complete control. Auto-upgrades from the OEM pushed out over the air can bring production to a halt when critical business functions break. At a bare minimum, they can bring a network to a standstill as large upgrades are forced through the ISP connection into the building or site. An EMM should therefore offer integrations with the OEM-specific OTA and/or firmware upgrade protocols to put the controls in the admins' hands. 6. Lockdown and Kiosk Modes Rugged devices should boot into the work, not into Android. Enforce kiosk/lockdown, strict app allow-lists, settings restrictions, and consistent UX across every DC and store. The EMM should offer configurability over what is displayed on the lockdown, including personalization and customization to offer links to additional items such as launching apps, toolbars, or script executions. 7. Enrollment that Fits the Reality of Rugged Use Android Enterprise Device Owner (AEDO) with a barcode-driven process (e.g., Zebra StageNow). It’s fast, repeatable, and minimizes user taps and mis-taps on the floor. Wi-Fi credentials can be encrypted in the barcode rather than shared haphazardly and manually entered by end users into the Setup Wizard. More granular control over initial network connectivity is also afforded as compared with the limited options available through DPC extras if using the designated AEDO QR method. Avoid Zero Touch Enrollment (ZTE) for rugged Wi-Fi-only devices. ZTE is not "Zero Touch" as it realistically pushes many touches (and possible errors) to end users. There is overhead and maintenance to unenroll and re-enroll devices into the portal as they go in and out of repair. Enterprise-grade devices are often covered under repair contracts due to the nature of the environments they’re used in. This means they are going in and out of repair relatively frequently, and ZTE portal management ends up causing more bottlenecks than the steps it’s otherwise designed to free up. StageNow barcode flows are fewer steps and far more reliable for DCs and stores. 8. Closed Networks and Offline Constraints Many rugged sites have limited or no access to Google services. Your EMM must support managed app configuration and device policies in ways that don’t depend on real-time Managed Play orchestration. If your only path is Play-mediated, you’ll struggle with timing, visibility, and outcomes. Look for an EMM that offers “offline” or standalone Managed Configuration support by reading and exposing the configuration schema of an uploaded Enterprise app. 9. Health Analytics, Drift Detection, and Scripting Device health analytics (compliance, connectivity, install status) are critical for early detection and fleet stability. Pair that with a scripting engine and policy-driven rules (e.g., automatic relocation, auto-heal) to keep devices in line without manual human intervention. 10. What to Deprioritize (and Why) BYOD-centric EMMs that can’t directly install private APKs, can’t push files, and don’t include Remote Control as a first-class capability will drag deployments and support. Many EMMs specifically lack the granular APK/file control, versioning/rollback discipline, and integrated Remote Control required for rugged Android in DCs and stores; workarounds add fragility and cost without closing the gaps. Bonus – Identity and SSO Newer EMMs are offering advanced capabilities around Identity Management and SSO across business apps. As enterprise-grade devices become more multi-purpose, more mobile apps are being installed, each often with its own separate login requirements. Over time, there will be increasing needs to supply SSO workflows on-device across these business apps and to offer a clean pathway to script and automate the cleanup of a prior user’s session across all apps as they log off and make way for the next user to log in. If in the EMM selection process today, look for an EMM that offers these capabilities. Even if those features are not needed today, it is almost certainly the next set of features enterprises will look for and need to adopt. The Quick Scorecard If you can’t answer “yes” to these with your selected EMM/MDM, you’re taking unnecessary risk: Can your EMM install a specific APK build directly to AEDO devices? Can you canary a new version to one site, schedule a 2 a.m. cutover, and roll back instantly if needed? Can you push a JSON config change and a DataWedge .db to 500 devices in under 10 minutes—no manual touches? Can support remotely control the screen and pull logs/files from the same session? Can you execute Zebra MX XML, enforce kiosk/lockdown, and set scanner behavior centrally across models? Can you deploy LifeGuard/.ZIP OS updates by group, with maintenance windows and rollback? Can you enroll with StageNow barcodes (AEDO) instead of relying on ZTE flows designed for non-rugged scenarios? Can you operate cleanly in sites with limited/blocked Google services, including offline managed config workflows? Bottom Line A capable rugged EMM/MDM gives you deterministic control over versions, files, firmware, and front-line support—at fleet scale and on your schedule. Prioritize direct APK delivery, file distribution, OEM-level controls, Remote Control, AEDO barcode enrollment, and firmware orchestration. Deprioritize BYOD-first tools and any workflow that forces you through black box Play timing or pushes enrollment burden to associates on the floor. I’d love to hear what the comments have to say. Am I way off base? Do you fundamentally disagree? Or were you nodding along as you read through this. Let me know below! Oh and "AI", forgot to mention the buzzword. MattEnable third-party Android mobile management
Hey Android Enterprise community, I'm trying to understand what the "Enable third-party Android mobile management" checkbox in Google Admin does. How does this affect situations where multiple Android Enterprises are bound to multiple EMM solutions? Will both Android Enterprise continue working if they are bound to different EMM solutions, even if only one is selected on the screen above? If I use the Enrollment token link method to provision a device and have no users in my Google Workspace, will switching the EMM provider in the dropdown below the checkbox have any effect? Also, does Authenticate Using Google affect provisioning if there are no users in Google Workspace? Thanks, Marko[Day 4] Managed Google Domains: What, why, and how to upgrade
What is a Managed Google Domain? In Android Enterprise land, a Managed Google Domain refers to using a Google-managed organisation (like Cloud Identity or Google Workspace) to create and manage the connection to an EMM (the bind), it sits in contrast with Managed Google Play accounts, which uses a “personal” Gmail account to manage enterprise devices and apps. In practical terms, it means Android management is tied to an organisation’s work domain (e.g. @company.com), managed through the Google Admin console, rather than being tied to a single @gmail.com account. This approach unifies Android management with other Google services (Workspace, Chrome, etc.) under one organisational account, and is not only the default approach for all newly-binding organisations, but recommended by Google as an upgrade for all existing managed Google Play accounts enterprises due to the benefits it provides to IT admins and employees. Historically, organisations (even those with Google Workspace) used a managed Google Play Accounts setup - essentially registering Android Enterprise with a Gmail account - arguably said Gmail account could be created under a domain by using an existing email address, but this isn’t foolproof. The EMM (Enterprise Mobility Management solution) would then create generic managed Google Play accounts on each device for app distribution, account management, and so on. This legacy method worked, but it meant the entire Android Enterprise bind was owned by a personal account. It also means for devices there was no user identity, so things like automatic provisioning of the Google suite of applications with a managed account wouldn’t happen, and if a user was to add a managed account, behaviour around the app store, data sync, and more would become a challenge. Look familiar? Now, Google has introduced a better way. Why Google has (mostly) moved away from Gmail-based accounts Using a personal Gmail to manage enterprise devices has been convenient, but it poses security and management risks. For one, a Gmail-based enterprise bind is outside your corporate identity control - security teams cringe at the idea that the keys to your mobile fleet are held by an unmanaged personal account. There’s no way to enforce corporate security policies (no mandatory SSO, no corporate-managed 2FA or security keys) on a personal Google account. It also creates a single point of failure: if a Gmail owner leaves the company or loses access, recovering the account (and therefore control of all devices) can be difficult. Google’s solution is the Managed Google Domain - essentially migrating Android Enterprise enrolment to a proper Google organisation owned by the business. This shifts control from a personal account to corporate-owned credentials, immediately strengthening security. IT admins (plural, as now there can be several!) can log in with their work email and leverage enterprise-grade protections like multi-factor authentication (MFA), security keys, and single sign-on. In short, it “severs the tie” to the personal account and brings Android management under your company’s identity and policies. Equally important, Google is future-proofing Android Enterprise with this change. The new domain-led approach, rolled out in 2024, eliminates previous limitations. For example, historically one Google account could only bind to one EMM at a time. Now, once your domain is verified, you can actually bind multiple EMMs (or multiple instances of an EMM) to the same organisation - useful for testing a new EMM or running production and sandbox environments simultaneously. It also lays the groundwork for deeper integration with Google’s AI and cross-device features that rely on full Google accounts. How to upgrade to a Managed Google Domain For organisations currently on the older managed Google Play accounts bind, upgrading is straightforward and free. Google offers a one-way migration path from the Play Accounts enterprise to a managed domain enterprise. You can initiate it either via your EMM console’s Managed Google Play iframe or through an EMM provider’s implementation of the respective APIs: Via EMM Console (Play iframe): In your EMM console, navigate to the Managed Google Play area (for example, the app approval section). Many consoles now display an “Upgrade for free” banner or button at the top of the embedded Play iframe if your Android Enterprise is currently bound with a Gmail account. Clicking this starts the upgrade flow. You’ll be asked to sign in with the current owner account (the Gmail that was used originally), then provide a work email to act as the new admin account for the Google domain. If your organisation already has a Google Workspace or Cloud Identity domain, you can log in with a super admin of that domain to bind the enterprise to it. (Don’t worry - the Android Enterprise enrolment will belong to the domain itself, not that individual admin account.) If you don’t have an existing Google domain, you can create a new Managed Google Domain on the fly using your work email’s domain. For example, if you enter it@company.com, Google will set up a Cloud Identity domain for “company.com”. You’ll verify your email address and later have the option to perform full domain verification (to unlock all features, e.g authenticate with Google, ChromeOS management, and more. Via EMM API: Some EMMs may provide their own “upgrade” prompt or process using Google’s direct APIs. The steps are essentially the same - the EMM triggers the creation or linkage to a Managed Google Domain, and you supply a corporate email domain to either link or create the Google admin account. Speak to your EMM vendor for details on how to achieve this. Log in or create an account Authorise the migration Do a little shimmy, you’re done. After a successful upgrade, your Android Enterprise is now managed in the Google Admin console (under Devices > Mobile & endpoints, etc.). Notably, you should no longer use the old Play console for enterprise settings - those settings move into the Admin console and your EMM interface. The migration is again one-way; you cannot revert back to a Gmail-based setup, so double-check that chosen domain! The good news is that all your enrolled devices and approved apps remain intact - the change is largely on the backend linkage, and it does not unenrol devices or remove apps in your EMM console. Key Benefits of Using a Managed Google Domain: recapped Upgrading to a managed domain unlocks a range of benefits for both IT administrators and end users: Stronger Security & Admin Control: Admins log in with work email addresses and managed identities, not consumer Gmail. This means you can enforce your usual security policies (company SSO, MFA, password rules) on these accounts. Google specifically highlights that this allows enterprise-grade authentication - you can require admin logins to use multi-factor auth, hardware security keys, etc. Account recovery is also simplified (the domain super admin can reset passwords or reassign admin roles as needed). No more worrying about a single person “owning” the enterprise—ownership now belongs to the organisation. Single Sign-On (SSO) and Microsoft Integration: If your company uses Microsoft 365/Azure AD for identity, Google has made the integration seamless. The sign-up process can work directly with Microsoft 365 accounts, automatically tying in your external Azure AD identity as the IdP for the Google domain. This means your users (and admins) can authenticate with their Microsoft corporate credentials to access managed Google Play and other Google services, without you having to manually configure a SAML SSO federation. Google essentially removes the extra SSO setup step when you use a Microsoft-managed domain during the bind. Multiple EMMs and Flexibility: A Managed Google Domain allows binding multiple EMM instances to your single organisation ID. Practically, this means you could have, say, your primary EMM and a test EMM environment both managing subsets of devices under the same Google enterprise. Or, if you are transitioning between EMM vendors, you can connect the new EMM without unbinding the old one, then migrate gradually. This was impossible in the old Gmail-based model. Unified Admin Console & Google Services: Once on a managed domain, you gain access to the Google Admin console for device management and more. Beyond just Android management, this opens the door to centrally manage other Google products. For example, your team could explore using Google Workspace apps, Google Chrome management, or even new AI tools like Google Gemini on Android, all managed from one place. Better Employee Onboarding: With a managed domain, users can enrol their devices using their corporate credentials (email/password or SSO) rather than a special code or dummy account. This makes the provisioning experience more intuitive - they log in with their company email during setup, which configures the work profile/device. It also means if they already use Google Workspace, their apps and data can populate seamlessly. Legacy Managed Play Accounts can still be leveraged I mean this in two ways.. First, not every organisation may be ready to move to a Managed Google Domain immediately, and that’s OK. Google isn’t shutting down the old method yet. If you don’t have a Google domain or aren’t in a position to use one, you can continue using the managed Google Play Accounts approach with a Gmail admin account - your EMM will keep generating the necessary managed play accounts on devices as it always has. Nothing stops your Android Enterprise deployment from functioning, and Google will allow maintaining the legacy binding for now. Secondly, even if you were to migrate to a Managed Google Domain, some devices and use cases simply don’t suit user authentication/association. EMMs that support it should offer a personal use option for dedicated devices that will still provision a managed Google Play account for dedicated, userless devices. That use case isn’t going anywhere with this change. So, should you upgrade to a Managed Google Domain? If you can - absolutely: all the newest features and integrations are being built with Managed Google Domains in mind. So while you won’t be left in the cold if you stick with the old Gmail-based bind today, you’ll be missing out on security improvements and future capabilities going forward. Toodles, Jason
AMAPI prepareEnvironment() failing with ApiLevelException on Android 8 despite using DEVICE_POLICY_CONTROLLER role
Hi everyone, I’m implementing a custom DPC (device owner) and integrating AMAPI locally on the device. On Android 8 / 8.1, calling: val request = PrepareEnvironmentRequest.builder() .setRoles( listOf( Role.builder() .setRoleType(Role.RoleType.DEVICE_POLICY_CONTROLLER) .build() ) ) .setAdmin(admin) .build() immediately fails with: com.google.android.managementapi.common.exceptions.ApiLevelException On Android 10 and above, I don't have this exception. According to the AMAPI documentation: If the device's SDK API level is insufficient for certain requested roles (this may be in addition to a general minimum API level requirement for the call itself).{@code Role.RoleType.DEVICE_POLICY_CONTROLLER} requires API level 23 or above. Any other roles require API level 28 or above. I am using the latest AMAPI client library: com.google.android.libraries.enterprise.amapi:amapi:1.7.0 Questions Is AMAPI (EnvironmentClient + Device Policy Controller role) still officially supported on Android 8/8.1? Any clarification on the real minimum supported API level for AMAPI prepareEnvironment() would be greatly appreciated, as the documentation suggests Android 8 should work, but the behavior indicates otherwise. Thanks![Day 1] Mobile Devices With a Sixth Sense: What Android Can Learn From Detection Dogs
Good afternoon everyone! Intro Alongside my passion for Android, which I’ve also made my profession, I spend a lot of my personal time working on scent detection training with dogs. Over the years I’ve trained my own dogs to search for items such as data carriers, phones, cannabis, and most recently one on cash. I wanted to participate in the festival because I had to skip the opportunity last year. But to contribute meaningfully, I wanted to create something that connects both worlds, Android and my other interests. This article is the result of that cross-pollination. The article is just a different perspective to discuss, a thought I had and a look in to what I think could be a good future. Android & detection / search dogs Enterprise mobility is still too often reduced to policies, profiles, and compliance checkboxes. A device shows compliant, an app is locked down, and the job seems done. But anyone who has worked with a well-trained detection dog knows that control is only half the story. The real value comes from analyzing behavior and context, and the ability to anticipate on what’s coming. Fun fact: Our nose, and a dogs nose, contain olfactory receptors, nerve cells that detect odor molecules, which is what we use to recognize a scent. An average human has around 2 to 6 million of those. A dog’s nose has around 250-300 million. They are capable of detecting so much more scents than we do. A detection dog doesn’t just smell an object. It smells the contents, the ingredients of what it’s made of and It detects deviations. It recognizes not only what is present, but also when a situation doesn’t match the pattern it expects. If something has disturbed the soil, it will recognize that. And as a handler you should be able to read to signals and act on it. If you want to go right, and the dog is showing that it recognizes a scent on the left, you should really go left and trust the signals your dog is sending you. As a dog handler I’m trusting my dog to make the right decisions, I just follow and guide the dog where needed. Lift him to higher grounds, or maybe mark areas of extra interest that I can see and I’ve been told to search. Its teamwork. Devices as Sensors Imagine a device that doesn’t only enforce policy but also understands what normal looks like in its environment. Not only checking whether something is allowed, but noticing when something is unexpected. A phone that has spent months connected only to Wi-Fi inside the warehouse but suddenly appears on 4G at two in the morning in another city, that may not be a direct policy violation, but it is something you and I would ask questions about. Any detection dog would pause, tilt its head, and quietly signal that something’s off. The ingredients to make devices smarter already exist. Smartphones capture motion, location, battery patterns, network behavior, app usage, and user interaction. Individually these are datapoints, but together they form a pattern, just like scent particles form a track for example. The interesting part is: the hardware has been ready for years. What we lack is interpretation. Fun fact: Did you know that when a dog is searching/sniffing, it can inhale and exhale up to 300 times per minute? If we would do this, we will start hyperventilating within seconds. I think Android could evolve in the same direction by learning baselines of enterprise-normal rather than relying solely on static policies. Once a baseline exists, devices can flag changes proactively, early before things escalate. An example Consider a warehouse worker scanning goods along the same aisle, during the same shift, using the same three apps every day. Android sees that, learns it, and identifies it as normal. But one Monday everything is different: roaming is active, a new route is taken, unfamiliar apps are running. Instead of asking only is this allowed?, the device could ask is this unusual?, should I report this?, is this risk or intentional deviation? As an IT admin, you could check those signals and take appropriate action. But maybe we want Android Enterprise to take their own actions up to a certain degree? This isn’t just security, it also improves stability, efficiency and less downtime. Combine all these and you might even have an employee who is actually happy with the work IT is doing. Instead of being the team who keeps blocking things, you become the IT admin that makes the devices just work when they need to. Closing note I am aware of different MDM’s providing such solutions such as WS1 and Knox Asset intelligence. But I think it could and should be so much better than that. It should be part of core Android OS, present for everyone, not just the one who can afford it but also the smaller companies with less budget. It shouldn’t be depending on a third party whether or not this works. Android Enterprise has matured. Policies are essential, but they’re not the finish line. The real opportunity lies in devices that understand normal, and detect subtle deviations before users even notice. Maybe it’s time our Android fleets developed a sense of intuition. Maybe it's time for Android fleets to develop their own sixth sense like a detection dog that quietly sits, nose raised, because it notices something no one else does yet.
GBoard - Suggestion Strip
Hi, We want to use GBoard on kiosk devices but we aren't able to remove the suggestion strip using managed configurations. All other settings can be configured fine though. The show suggestion strip configuration is set to disabled. But with versions 15.x and 16.x of GBoard it's still visible on the devices. And when checking the setting locally on the device it's still enabled (Disabling manually works fine) Back in version 14.x this configuration worked fine. Anyone else who has experienced the same thing? We've tested this on devices from Samsung, Bluebird, ELO, and Zebra. Android version doesn't seem to have any impact, just the GBoard version. // Magnus
Unable to upload bulk CSV file to ZeroTouch
Hi Team, Is there currently an issue uploading a bulk .csv file to ZeroTouch? It's giving me an error. See below. Steps below: I downloaded the sample .csv file then updated it with my data, then uploading it again to the portal as is without changing the name or file extension as seeing above, yet its giving me an error. This was working not long ago, just wondering if there is currently an issue. Thanks
Enable ADB debugging is grayed out - This setting is managed by your administrator
This issue was documented in 2021 but with no solution. My Chromebook is managed by my company and I am the manager. But Google tries to find the managed option to unlock for this to work in the administration interface for more than 15 days without success. By the way there are thousands of options in the admin interface it could be a clever feature to number them. If you are in front of the same issue please add your comments to this post. I hope that Google support will succeed to solve the issue soon because I developed my first app for Android on my Chromebook with Android Studio and I was able to download it to my phone before these 15 days.
Device screen sensitivity
Hello AE community, Our users encounter screen sensitivity issue while using a screen proctection on their devices, Device impacted is Samsung A9+, There is a setting to enhance screen sensitivity but it is not manageable thought Ivanti NMDM, or Knox Service Plugin. We also use Bluebird devices, for this manufacturer, sensitity setting is manageable using their OEM Config app. Is there another method to manage this setting ? Should i make a FER (Feature Enhancement Request) to Samsung directly ? Regards Batlac
REQUIRE_ENTRY flag not working as expected
Hello, I am working on a Mobile Device Management system and just received a bug report about the Require Entry option when resetting a password. Since I set the Require Entry option I expect that the device does not accept any new password changes until I unlocked it at least once with the new credentials. This did not work. I was able to change the password numerous times over the Google API without logging in once. In your documentation here: https://developers.google.com/android/management/reference/rest/v1/enterprises.devices/issueCommand#ResetPasswordFlag it' s outlined that the flag should force the device to not accept any other password changes over the Google API by admins until the user has entered the new password. REQUIRE_ENTRY Don't allow other admins to change the password again until the user has entered it. I traced the issue through my software and checked all requests. My initial request to Google services looks like this. { "type":"RESET_PASSWORD", "resetPasswordFlags":[ "REQUIRE_ENTRY" ], "newPassword":"111111" } Here is clearly observable that the REQUIRE_ENTRY flag is sent to Google. Furthermore Google also includes the flag in it's response. { "name":"RouterSuccess", "code":200, "message":"OK", "data":{ "name":"enterprises/LC01zoikuz/devices/33c202b53a9b800c/operations/1764168989992", "metadata":{ "@type":"type.googleapis.comgoogle.android.devicemanagement.v1.Command", "type":"RESET_PASSWORD", "createTime":"2025-11-26T14:56:29.992Z", "duration":"600s", "newPassword":"111111", "resetPasswordFlags":[ "REQUIRE_ENTRY" ], "userName":"enterprises/LC01zoikuz/users/107976853558892540833" } } } So I assume that my API calls are working fine. Now I started to look into the adb logs of my device. I sent two reset password commands, one with the Require Entry option enabled and one without. I grepped the logs for "password" as a keyword and compared the results with a tool. Those are the logs of my request with Require Entry enabled: 11-26 10:16:45.367 2770 6955 I SDPLog : Reset password with token for user 0 11-26 10:16:45.654 1301 8837 I keystore2: system/security/keystore2/src/security_level.rs:829 - In import_key. 1000, Some("synthetic_password_293151ba28441a0d") 11-26 10:16:45.654 1301 8837 I keystore2: system/security/keystore2/src/security_level.rs:832 - synthetic password changed : 1000 11-26 10:16:45.655 1301 8837 I keystore2: system/security/keystore2/src/database.rs:2158 - In store_new_key "synthetic_password_293151ba28441a0d", uid=103, cert=false, cert_chain=false rebound=false 11-26 10:16:45.672 2770 6955 I SyntheticPasswordCrypto: Deleted SP protector key synthetic_password_a94cb138ecf734eb 11-26 10:16:46.071 2770 6955 I PasswordPolicy: isExternalStorageForFailedPasswordsWipeExcluded() : no admin enforce password policy. 11-26 10:16:46.091 6382 24694 I clouddpc: [PolicyUpdaterImpl.java:fromCache:214] From cache started [passwordPolicies, passwordRequirements, encryptionPolicy] forceComplianceReport: false 11-26 10:16:46.091 6382 24694 I clouddpc: [EventLogManagerImpl.kt:logMessage:2049] Event logged: RequestPolicyUpdateFromCache details: [policyKeys=[passwordPolicies, passwordRequirements, encryptionPolicy], forceComplianceReport=false] metadata: [isNetworkConnected=true] 11-26 10:16:46.091 6382 7741 I clouddpc: [EventLogManagerImpl.kt:logMessage:2049] Event logged: PolicyUpdateStarted details: [policyKeys=[encryptionPolicy, passwordPolicies, passwordRequirements], forceComplianceReport=false] metadata: [isNetworkConnected=true] 11-26 10:16:46.092 6382 7741 I clouddpc: [PolicyUpdaterImpl.java:reApplyAndExecuteCompliance:597] Updating policies: [encryptionPolicy, passwordPolicies, passwordRequirements] from cache with force report: false reportApps: false 11-26 10:16:46.096 6382 7741 I clouddpc: [PasswordRequirementsHandler.kt:apply:79] passwordPolicies is set, ignoring passwordRequirements 11-26 10:16:46.112 6382 7741 I clouddpc: [DefaultPasswordUtils.java:setPasswordRelatedPolicy:129] Applying password quality (server enum value): 65536 with scope: 0 11-26 10:16:46.113 6382 7741 I clouddpc: [PasswordPoliciesHandler.kt:applyResetPasswordToken$java_com_google_android_apps_work_clouddpc_base_policy_handlers_handlers:384] Reset password token already active 11-26 10:16:46.153 6382 7741 I clouddpc: [EventLogManagerImpl.kt:logMessage:2049] Event logged: PolicyReapplied details: [policyKeys=[encryptionPolicy, passwordPolicies, passwordRequirements]] metadata: [isNetworkConnected=true] And these are the logs without Require Entry activated: 11-26 10:17:14.229 2770 4719 I SDPLog : Reset password with token for user 0 11-26 10:17:14.517 1301 8837 I keystore2: system/security/keystore2/src/security_level.rs:829 - In import_key. 1000, Some("synthetic_password_89ec84ca283671b1") 11-26 10:17:14.517 1301 8837 I keystore2: system/security/keystore2/src/security_level.rs:832 - synthetic password changed : 1000 11-26 10:17:14.518 1301 8837 I keystore2: system/security/keystore2/src/database.rs:2158 - In store_new_key "synthetic_password_89ec84ca283671b1", uid=103, cert=false, cert_chain=false rebound=false 11-26 10:17:14.536 2770 4719 I SyntheticPasswordCrypto: Deleted SP protector key synthetic_password_293151ba28441a0d 11-26 10:17:14.935 2770 4719 I PasswordPolicy: isExternalStorageForFailedPasswordsWipeExcluded() : no admin enforce password policy. 11-26 10:17:14.953 6382 24694 I clouddpc: [PolicyUpdaterImpl.java:fromCache:214] From cache started [passwordPolicies, passwordRequirements, encryptionPolicy] forceComplianceReport: false 11-26 10:17:14.954 6382 24694 I clouddpc: [EventLogManagerImpl.kt:logMessage:2049] Event logged: RequestPolicyUpdateFromCache details: [policyKeys=[passwordPolicies, passwordRequirements, encryptionPolicy], forceComplianceReport=false] metadata: [isNetworkConnected=true] 11-26 10:17:14.954 6382 7741 I clouddpc: [EventLogManagerImpl.kt:logMessage:2049] Event logged: PolicyUpdateStarted details: [policyKeys=[encryptionPolicy, passwordPolicies, passwordRequirements], forceComplianceReport=false] metadata: [isNetworkConnected=true] 11-26 10:17:14.955 6382 7741 I clouddpc: [PolicyUpdaterImpl.java:reApplyAndExecuteCompliance:597] Updating policies: [encryptionPolicy, passwordPolicies, passwordRequirements] from cache with force report: false reportApps: false 11-26 10:17:14.958 6382 7741 I clouddpc: [PasswordRequirementsHandler.kt:apply:79] passwordPolicies is set, ignoring passwordRequirements 11-26 10:17:14.974 6382 7741 I clouddpc: [DefaultPasswordUtils.java:setPasswordRelatedPolicy:129] Applying password quality (server enum value): 65536 with scope: 0 11-26 10:17:14.975 6382 7741 I clouddpc: [PasswordPoliciesHandler.kt:applyResetPasswordToken$java_com_google_android_apps_work_clouddpc_base_policy_handlers_handlers:384] Reset password token already active 11-26 10:17:15.012 6382 7741 I clouddpc: [EventLogManagerImpl.kt:logMessage:2049] Event logged: PolicyReapplied details: [policyKeys=[encryptionPolicy, passwordPolicies, passwordRequirements]] metadata: [isNetworkConnected=true] I compared both results but were not able to detect any differences on the device. Thank you and best regards lennartsp
