No accounts found Zero touch
as per : ZTE Portal - no account found | Android Enterprise and ChromeOS Customer Communities - 4093 I'm an admin of a Google workspace instance, let's call it Acme, LLC. This is Google Workspace Business Plus I'm an admin (not owner) of a Android Zero Touch instance, with the ability to make changes to: Configs Devices Users Resellers, etc I've logged into Workspace.google.com for Acme, Inc. Gone to Devices, Mobile & Endpoints, Settings, Enrollment, Manage Zero Touch devices, Link, log in using AZTE user and get the rather lovely: MDM is set to advanced, by the way
Unable to upload bulk CSV file to ZeroTouch
Hi Team, Is there currently an issue uploading a bulk .csv file to ZeroTouch? It's giving me an error. See below. Steps below: I downloaded the sample .csv file then updated it with my data, then uploading it again to the portal as is without changing the name or file extension as seeing above, yet its giving me an error. This was working not long ago, just wondering if there is currently an issue. Thanks
Zero Touch phones randomly wipe themselves
Hello, We are a large corporate and mostly use Samsung phones as Android devices. Enrolment is being done via ZT portal to a default profile which is Corporate Owned Work Profile provided via Microsoft Intune. We are noticing an increased amount of cases where users set up their phones (no QR code, no text token) with default configuration added using DPC extras and within first few hours they would reset to a factory default state without any notice. This has become a real issue as it is affecting more and more people. Devices enrolled without ZT do not suffer from this issue, even though they are using the exact same enrolment profile. I saw many posts like this here and elsewhere on the internet, but no actual solution. What is the problem here and is it being actively looked by Google?
WPCO Enrollment into Google Workspace using Zero Touch
Hi there! I am implementing Zero Touch enrollment for our newly purchased Android devices. It is working well and our testing devices end up in "Fully Managed" state after enrollment. I have been wondering if the enrollment could be adjusted so the device ends up in "Work profile on corporate-owned" (WPCO) state instead. I have done a little research and Android spec should allow a device to end up in WPCO state after it is enrolled via Zero Touch. Is this end result achievable with following combination? Device: Samsung with Android 14 Enrollment: Zero Touch during device setup EMM: Google Workspace Google Workspace AFAIK does not have any switch for this in UI. Could the management mode be configured during Zero Touch by using DPC extras set in Zero Touch portal? Developer oriented documentation suggests this is governed by EXTRA_PROVISIONING_MODE. I have tried following Custom Configurations in Google Zero Touch portal so far (all targeting com.google.android.apps.work.clouddpc) : { "android.app.extra.PROVISIONING_ADMIN_EXTRAS_BUNDLE": { "com.google.android.apps.work.clouddpc.EXTRA_FORCED_DOMAINS": "[\"mycompany.com\"]", "PROVISIONING_MODE": "MANAGED_PROFILE" } } and { "android.app.extra.PROVISIONING_ADMIN_EXTRAS_BUNDLE": { "com.google.android.apps.work.clouddpc.EXTRA_FORCED_DOMAINS": "[\"company.com\"]" }, "android.app.extra.PROVISIONING_MODE": "2" } and { "android.app.extra.PROVISIONING_DEVICE_ADMIN_COMPONENT_NAME": "com.google.android.apps.work.clouddpc/.receivers.CloudDeviceAdminReceiver", "android.app.extra.PROVISIONING_DEVICE_ADMIN_SIGNATURE_CHECKSUM": "<SIG-CHECK>", "android.app.extra.PROVISIONING_DEVICE_ADMIN_PACKAGE_DOWNLOAD_LOCATION": "https://play.google.com/managed/downloadManagingApp?identifier=setup", "android.app.extra.PROVISIONING_ROLE_HOLDER_SIGNATURE_CHECKSUM": "<SIG-CHECK>", "android.app.extra.PROVISIONING_ROLE_HOLDER_PACKAGE_DOWNLOAD_LOCATION": "https://play.google.com/managed/downloadManagingApp?identifier=setup", "android.app.extra.PROVISIONING_ADMIN_EXTRAS_BUNDLE": { "com.google.android.apps.work.clouddpc.EXTRA_ENROLLMENT_TOKEN": "<TOKEN>", "com.google.android.apps.work.clouddpc.EXTRA_FORCED_DOMAINS": "[\"company.com\"]", "PROVISIONING_MODE": "MANAGED_PROFILE" } } In all three case the devices goes trough Zero Touch enrollment. Device Policy is installed. User is required to log in with a Google Account with company.com account. The device ended up in "Fully Managed" state in all three cases...My application was rejected
Hello, good afternoon everyone. I'm writing to this forum to ask for help. A few weeks ago, I applied for the EMM and Enterprise Android Partner program. My application was rejected without any explanation in the emails. I'd like to know the requirements to join the program. We are a development company based in Guatemala and the United States (and soon in Mexico and Colombia), as we currently have a client requesting an MDM system for their Android device retail store. This is our first time applying to this program so we can offer our services to this client and any future clients who might be interested. If you could send me the program requirements so I can apply correctly, I would be very grateful. Have a good afternoon. Greetings from Guatemala.
GSF ID not generated after device enrollment on Android 15
Hi everyone, We’re facing an issue with devices running Android 15 — after successfully enrolling them in our Android Enterprise setup (Device Owner / Fully Managed mode), the Google Services Framework (GSF) ID is not being generated. This issue did not occur on Android 13 or 14; the GSF ID was available immediately after enrollment. However, on Android 15, the GSF ID remains empty even after waiting and rebooting. We’ve already tried: Factory reset and re-enrollment Checking Google Play Services version Ensuring the device is connected to the internet Waiting for Play Store sync Despite that, the GSF ID is still missing. Could anyone confirm if there’s a known change in Android 15 related to GSF ID generation, or if additional permissions/configuration are required for enterprise-enrolled devices to obtain it? Any guidance or workaround would be greatly appreciated.
