AMAPI requests for enterprises.applications.get and enterprises.policies.patch are failing intermittently
Is anyone observing AMAPI requests for GetApplication and PatchPolicies failing intermittently ? I am observing intermittent failures with the log - "googleapi: Error 503: The service is currently unavailable., backendError".
Chrome OS + Crostini: The Missing Bridge to Android Development
Hello Community, I recently read an article about connecting a Windows PC to an Android phone, which got me thinking: we need a similar focus on connecting Chrome OS (via Crostini) to Android devices. Since both Android and Chrome OS are Google products, the integration should be seamless. If Google wants to grow Chrome OS adoption, developers are the ideal first target. However, making it easy for developers to build Android apps on Chrome OS must be a priority, and currently, there are significant friction points. The Technical Blockers My Android development on Chrome OS has been halted for over a month due to persistent issues: ADB Debugging on Managed Devices: My managed Chromebook (I am the admin) has the "Enable ADB debugging" toggle locked. Despite a month of searching, I haven't found a fix. Connection Instability: Both USB and Wi-Fi debugging work intermittently and then fail. I have tested this with a modern Android 15 phone and an older Lollipop tablet; the connection fails on both, pointing to an issue on the Chromebook side. USB File Transfer: There is a known issue transferring files from Crostini to USB devices (requiring a workaround of copying to the Chrome OS files app first). The Strategic Picture Google should not depend on Microsoft Windows for Android development. Chrome OS is already a high-quality product—I use it daily. For example, upgrading my Crostini VM from Debian 12 (Bookworm) to Debian 13 (Trixie) was a pleasure and required no reinstallation. This stability proves Chrome OS is a serious development platform, not just a "cheap" alternative. Addressing the "Aluminum OS" Rumors There is a current campaign discrediting Chrome OS, citing rumors about a new "Aluminum OS." I believe these rumors are misinterpreted. Rather than dropping Chrome OS, it appears Google is aiming for the high-quality device segment. Regardless of naming conventions, Google is walking securely, step-by-step, from a browser to a full OS. Conclusion I strongly advise Google to continue its efforts in making Chrome OS a high-end development platform. The community is involved and patient (a major quality of developers!), but we need these bridge issues—specifically ADB debugging and USB file transfers—solved to fully unlock the potential of the ecosystem.Google Play Protect's new policy for custom DPC
Apparently, Google has a new policy that only approved DPCs can be installed through QR Provisioning; otherwise, their installation will be blocked. Link: https://developers.google.com/android/play-protect/warning-dev-guidance#android_enterprise_dpc_enrollment The problem is that I am not able to understand how to apply for DPC approval. I found this page, but still not able to find out where to apply. Your help is appreciated. Thanks
Unable to Add Work Profile on HONOR Magic V5 for Microsoft Intune Enrollment
Dear Android Enterprise Support Team, I am experiencing an issue while attempting to enroll my HONOR Magic V5 device into Microsoft Intune for device management. I just bought the device one week ago, but when I try to add a work profile, I receive the following error message: "Can't add work profile. A work profile can't be added to this HONOR Magic V5. If you have questions, contact your IT admin." This issue is preventing me from completing the enrollment process required by my organization. I have already consulted with my company’s global IT support team, and they confirmed that there is no alternative solution on our side. The only way to resolve this issue is for HONOR to make the HONOR Magic V5 compatible with the Microsoft Intune application and Android Enterprise work profile enrollment. Device Details: Model: HONOR Magic V5 OS Version: Magic OS 9.0.1 Android version: 15 Model: MBH-N49 Error Screenshot: attached as below Could you please advise if this device supports Android Enterprise work profiles or if there are any compatibility limitations? If there is a workaround or firmware update required, kindly provide guidance. Your prompt assistance would be greatly appreciated as this is impacting my ability to comply with company security policies.
Common identifier between AMAPI & Require for setup app for validation
We are enrolling devices using AMAPI by generating a QR code with an assigned policy either for work profile or fully managed enrollment. During enrollment, the device prompts for a require for setup app, which, after configuration, returns RESULT_OK, marking the setup as complete and finalizing the device enrollment. Before returning RESULT_OK, To identify the enrolling device, the backend gets the device ID and enterprise ID from the Pub/Sub provisioning notification. The device ID (which matches the GSF ID) is then sent by the require for setup app to the backend for validation. This identifier is also used to enforce enrollment limits based on the enterprise license count. The Issue: Up to Android 14, retrieving the GSF ID was possible. However, in Android 15, it now returns null. Question: Is there an alternative identifier that can be used to identify the enrolling device—one that the backend can retrieve and that the setup app can also access during enrollment? Below is the information we receive from Pub/Sub when a device is enrolled: { "name": [*Hidden for privacy reasons] "managementMode": "PROFILE_OWNER", "state": "PROVISIONING", "enrollmentTime": "2025-04-04T06:17:02.751Z", "lastPolicySyncTime": "2025-04-04T06:17:02.817Z", "softwareInfo": { "androidVersion": "15", "androidDevicePolicyVersionCode": 10323580, "androidDevicePolicyVersionName": "128.32.3 (10323580)", "androidBuildNumber": "AP3A.240905.015.A2", "deviceKernelVersion": "5.15.149-android13-8-00010-gc2e0ba41ba85-ab12040008", "bootloaderVersion": "unknown", "androidBuildTime": "2025-03-11T13:26:50Z", "securityPatchLevel": "2025-03-01", "primaryLanguageCode": "en-IN", "deviceBuildSignature": "c9009d01ebf9f5d0302bc71b2fe9aa9a47a432bba17308a3111b75d7b2143456", "systemUpdateInfo": { "updateStatus": "UP_TO_DATE" } }, "hardwareInfo": { "brand": "Redmi", "hardware": "mt6835", "deviceBasebandVersion": "MOLY.NR17.R1.TC8.PR2.SP.V1.P51,MOLY.NR17.R1.TC8.PR2.SP.V1.P51", "manufacturer": "Xiaomi", "serialNumber": [*Hidden for privacy reasons] "model": "23124RN87I", "enterpriseSpecificId": [*Hidden for privacy reasons] }, "policyName": [*Hidden for privacy reasons] "memoryInfo": { "totalRam": "5865836544", "totalInternalStorage": "806965248" }, "userName": [*Hidden for privacy reasons] "enrollmentTokenName": [*Hidden for privacy reasons] "securityPosture": { }, "ownership": "PERSONALLY_OWNED" } *Updated by Community admin - removed due to privacy reasons 4 April[Feedback] App installs: share your experiences & suggestions
Hello everyone, Our team is always interested to hear your insights around the current employee experience on managed Android devices and profiles (Work Profile). One specific area of focus is the application installation experience, particularly for apps installs that happen while the device is in use (not part of initial setup). The installation experience can vary depending on a variety of factors - the device model and Android version, configuration of your EMM’s DPC client, management mode of the device (fully managed vs. Work Profile), the permissions required by the app, the source of installation, permission policies, etc. Based on your setup, it would be fantastic to hear some of your user experiences and what improvements you’d potentially like to see? I know this is an interesting topic for many of you, so I'm looking forward to hearing your thoughts, feedback and having a good conversation. Massive thanks in advance, Lizzie
[Day 3] Dedicated to Dedicated: Non-negotiables for EMM/MDM in Rugged Android Deployments
Disclaimer: The following article captures the opinion of Matt Dermody, Senior Director of Enterprise Mobility at Manhattan Associates. The stances contained within are a reflection of Manhattan's specific focus on line-of-business Android devices, built on years of being "Dedicated to Dedicated." Background Manhattan Associates is a B2B software company specifically focused on best-in-class, line-of-business enterprise deployments of enterprise software such as Warehouse Management (WMS), Transportation Management (TMS), and Point-of-Sale (POS). These software deployments command high expectations of uptime and availability, and that ultimately encompasses the complete solution, including the mobile computers that the software runs on. Manhattan is dedicated to ensuring that our end customers have the best possible experience, and that involves ensuring that the dedicated devices running our software are also properly maintained and supported. Google defines a "dedicated device" as a company-owned device that is fully managed and locked down for a specific work purpose, often using a single app or a small set of apps. These devices are restricted from personal use and are used for business functions like point-of-sale systems, inventory scanners, or digital signage. Or in other words, all of the device types that Manhattan sells, deploys, and supports alongside our software solutions. In that sense, I guess it can be said that we are… Dedicated to Dedicated. Managing rugged, line-of-business Android devices is not the same as managing BYOD phones and laptops. These are mission-critical endpoints running specialized apps in warehouses, stores, yards, and DCs—downtime costs money and local IT is increasingly rare. Your EMM/MDM must control versions, files, firmware, and field support with precision. Anything less adds risk and operational drag. Situation Imagine having to explain to a CIO that a business-critical mobile app has automatically upgraded to a new version that breaks functionality, and there is no easy rollback available. Here is a preview of how that might look. That situation is all too common but can be prevented with the right EMM/MDM strategies. The mere thought of that possible situation keeps the Manhattan team up at night. We have spent years developing strategies to add predictability and stability into enterprise device deployments to prevent bad situations from ever happening. Philosophies & Strategies Here is a preview of some of the core philosophies surrounding Manhattan’s tailored approach to managing mission-critical device deployments. Some of these might be controversial, but these are the strategies that work for us. 1. App Distribution and Version Discipline Rigorous version control of enterprise apps—stage, canary, bulk rollout, and rollback—is a must. Rugged ops cannot afford “surprise” app updates or version creep. If you can’t downgrade quickly, you don’t control your risk surface. An EMM/MDM should offer direct installation of private APKs on fully managed devices. Auto-upgrades to the “latest only” through Managed Google Play can lead to instability and version drift. Look for a console that can deploy specific app builds to specific groups on your schedule. If your tool can’t install an APK directly onto devices, it’s the wrong tool for rugged. Period. You must target different versions/configs by environment—Stage, QA, Prod—often per site group. That includes app versions, config files, etc. 2. File Management for App and Scanner Configuration LoB apps often externalize key settings via JSON and similar external config files. For example, Zebra DataWedge uses .db files placed in a specific auto-import directory to control mission-critical scanner settings. Your EMM must place, update, and replace these files on demand and at scale—ideally without anyone touching a device. Emergency changes (host cutover, DNS rename, scanner tweak) should be a file push away, not an onsite scramble. 3. Remote Control and Log Retrieval Treat full-fidelity Remote Control as table stakes. Support must see what the user sees, drive the screen, and pull logs and files in one session. Anything “view only” or bolt-on only erodes speed to resolution. Relying on reports from the floor or grainy pictures of an error taken from another device are not sufficient tactics for troubleshooting mission-critical device deployments. When issues hit, you don’t want an insurance policy like Remote Control that can be used to quickly diagnose and test solutions; you want a tool. An EMM admin without Remote Control is effectively blind with their hands tied behind their back. 4. OEM-level Controls (Zebra/Honeywell) There are numerous configuration settings that enterprise-grade OEMs extend beyond the baseline Android Enterprise configuration APIs. These OEMs are generally years ahead of what is available in base Android from a configurability standpoint and often introduce configuration settings that may otherwise never arrive to the base OS. These granular configuration layers ultimately are what set enterprise-class devices apart from consumer-grade technology. It is therefore imperative that an EMM managing these devices has the capability to manage OEM configuration extension features directly. For Zebra, this involves execution of their MX XML, DataWedge behavior, button mapping, radios, and other rugged-specific controls—through native profiles or integrated mechanisms. OEMConfig is useful, especially for parity across EMMs, but you will hit practical limits in closed networks and with Play-dependent timing/visibility. OEMConfig is a lowest-common-denominator functionality that was designed as a bridge to enable limited AMAPI-aligned EMMs to manage OEM-level settings with the limited tools at their disposal. Your EMM should support both OEMConfig (at a bare minimum) and offer the flexibility of direct MX/file workflows so you’re not boxed in by the limitations of distributing device settings through a complex web of Google Play server infrastructure. Your EMM should offer the ability to manage settings directly on the devices it manages, without the added layers and black boxes of complexity. 5. Firmware and Security Patching Over-the-Air (OTA) upgrades are great, but only when the EMM admin is in complete control. Auto-upgrades from the OEM pushed out over the air can bring production to a halt when critical business functions break. At a bare minimum, they can bring a network to a standstill as large upgrades are forced through the ISP connection into the building or site. An EMM should therefore offer integrations with the OEM-specific OTA and/or firmware upgrade protocols to put the controls in the admins' hands. 6. Lockdown and Kiosk Modes Rugged devices should boot into the work, not into Android. Enforce kiosk/lockdown, strict app allow-lists, settings restrictions, and consistent UX across every DC and store. The EMM should offer configurability over what is displayed on the lockdown, including personalization and customization to offer links to additional items such as launching apps, toolbars, or script executions. 7. Enrollment that Fits the Reality of Rugged Use Android Enterprise Device Owner (AEDO) with a barcode-driven process (e.g., Zebra StageNow). It’s fast, repeatable, and minimizes user taps and mis-taps on the floor. Wi-Fi credentials can be encrypted in the barcode rather than shared haphazardly and manually entered by end users into the Setup Wizard. More granular control over initial network connectivity is also afforded as compared with the limited options available through DPC extras if using the designated AEDO QR method. Avoid Zero Touch Enrollment (ZTE) for rugged Wi-Fi-only devices. ZTE is not "Zero Touch" as it realistically pushes many touches (and possible errors) to end users. There is overhead and maintenance to unenroll and re-enroll devices into the portal as they go in and out of repair. Enterprise-grade devices are often covered under repair contracts due to the nature of the environments they’re used in. This means they are going in and out of repair relatively frequently, and ZTE portal management ends up causing more bottlenecks than the steps it’s otherwise designed to free up. StageNow barcode flows are fewer steps and far more reliable for DCs and stores. 8. Closed Networks and Offline Constraints Many rugged sites have limited or no access to Google services. Your EMM must support managed app configuration and device policies in ways that don’t depend on real-time Managed Play orchestration. If your only path is Play-mediated, you’ll struggle with timing, visibility, and outcomes. Look for an EMM that offers “offline” or standalone Managed Configuration support by reading and exposing the configuration schema of an uploaded Enterprise app. 9. Health Analytics, Drift Detection, and Scripting Device health analytics (compliance, connectivity, install status) are critical for early detection and fleet stability. Pair that with a scripting engine and policy-driven rules (e.g., automatic relocation, auto-heal) to keep devices in line without manual human intervention. 10. What to Deprioritize (and Why) BYOD-centric EMMs that can’t directly install private APKs, can’t push files, and don’t include Remote Control as a first-class capability will drag deployments and support. Many EMMs specifically lack the granular APK/file control, versioning/rollback discipline, and integrated Remote Control required for rugged Android in DCs and stores; workarounds add fragility and cost without closing the gaps. Bonus – Identity and SSO Newer EMMs are offering advanced capabilities around Identity Management and SSO across business apps. As enterprise-grade devices become more multi-purpose, more mobile apps are being installed, each often with its own separate login requirements. Over time, there will be increasing needs to supply SSO workflows on-device across these business apps and to offer a clean pathway to script and automate the cleanup of a prior user’s session across all apps as they log off and make way for the next user to log in. If in the EMM selection process today, look for an EMM that offers these capabilities. Even if those features are not needed today, it is almost certainly the next set of features enterprises will look for and need to adopt. The Quick Scorecard If you can’t answer “yes” to these with your selected EMM/MDM, you’re taking unnecessary risk: Can your EMM install a specific APK build directly to AEDO devices? Can you canary a new version to one site, schedule a 2 a.m. cutover, and roll back instantly if needed? Can you push a JSON config change and a DataWedge .db to 500 devices in under 10 minutes—no manual touches? Can support remotely control the screen and pull logs/files from the same session? Can you execute Zebra MX XML, enforce kiosk/lockdown, and set scanner behavior centrally across models? Can you deploy LifeGuard/.ZIP OS updates by group, with maintenance windows and rollback? Can you enroll with StageNow barcodes (AEDO) instead of relying on ZTE flows designed for non-rugged scenarios? Can you operate cleanly in sites with limited/blocked Google services, including offline managed config workflows? Bottom Line A capable rugged EMM/MDM gives you deterministic control over versions, files, firmware, and front-line support—at fleet scale and on your schedule. Prioritize direct APK delivery, file distribution, OEM-level controls, Remote Control, AEDO barcode enrollment, and firmware orchestration. Deprioritize BYOD-first tools and any workflow that forces you through black box Play timing or pushes enrollment burden to associates on the floor. I’d love to hear what the comments have to say. Am I way off base? Do you fundamentally disagree? Or were you nodding along as you read through this. Let me know below! Oh and "AI", forgot to mention the buzzword. MattGoogle Play update: new layer of security coming in 2026
Hello everyone, To enhance security on Android devices, Google has announced that developers of Android applications, including those distributed outside of the Google Play Store, will be required to complete developer verification in order for their apps to be installed on Android devices. This new policy is designed to combat the spread of malware and financial fraud by increasing developer accountability. Rollout starts in September 2026 for Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand. This requirement will be expanded globally in 2027 and beyond. We understand that enterprise organizations often use off-Play methods of distribution methods for private applications. As such: Applications installed on fully managed devices (DO) or within Work Profiles (BYOD and COPE) can continue to be installed, without developer verification, until September 2027. After this point, developer verification will be required for the app to be installed. Applications installed by EMM Device Policy Controllers (DPCs) will be exempt from requiring developer verification indefinitely. (For example, apps installed via Workspace ONE Intelligent Hub, Intune Company Portal, SOTI MobiControl, etc.) Private applications installed with Managed Google Play will be exempt from developer verification indefinitely. We would welcome your feedback on other application distribution methods used by your company and how this recent announcement will impact you. The Android Enterprise Team *Article updated 4 Sept 2025, by CM - minor text removal for clarity
