Recent discussions
Google Play Protect's new policy for custom DPC
Apparently, Google has a new policy that only approved DPCs can be installed through QR Provisioning; otherwise, their installation will be blocked. Link: https://developers.google.com/android/play-protect/warning-dev-guidance#android_enterprise_dpc_enrollment The problem is that I am not able to understand how to apply for DPC approval. I found this page, but still not able to find out where to apply. Your help is appreciated. ThanksSolvedBharat9 hours agoLevel 1.6: Donut507Views2likes5CommentsOption for MDM to place app shortcuts on home screen
We have a great wish to place shortcuts for specific apps on the home screen when the app is installed (or at a later point), but this doesn't seem to be possible. When we discuss this with our MDM provider (SOTI), we are told, it is a Google/Android limitation, and this seems a bit strange to me; is it really not possible to place shortcuts on the home screen to your own liking? I hope this resonates with others - or even better; that I can be corrected, and there is a smart and easy way to achieve this goal. We run all our Android devices as fully managed, if that is relevant.Stinus2 days agoLevel 1.6: Donut76Views0likes16CommentsDevice Owner Enrollment Error: “Organization Has Reached Its Usage Limits” Even With Zero Devices
Hi everyone, I’m trying to enroll a fully managed Android device using the Android Management API. I generate an enrollment token, create the QR code, factory reset the device, and start the QR-based provisioning process. Everything works until the Android Device Policy step, where I get the following error: “Since your organization has reached its usage limits, this device can’t be set up.” I am unable to get past this point. Here is what I have already checked: Listing devices through the API returns an empty list. There are no enrolled devices at all. Billing is active on the cloud project and the Android Management API is enabled. Enterprise creation works, policies return correctly, and I can generate enrollment tokens without any issues. The device is correctly factory reset and the QR scan is working as expected. I tested with both a Workspace-based enterprise and a Gmail-based enterprise. The same limit error appears on both, even though both enterprises have zero devices. I moved the cloud project under my organization in Google Cloud to avoid any project-level quota problems. Based on everything I have checked, it appears that the enterprise (or account) has been automatically restricted to a device quota of zero, and the restriction has not lifted even after several days. I would like to understand the following: Is this quota lock normal for new enterprises, and how long does it usually take to lift? Is this quota tied to AMAPI commercial approval? Is it expected that zero devices can be enrolled before approval? Is there any way to request a quota review so that at least one test device can be enrolled? I am building a commercial EMM solution and simply need to test device-owner provisioning on a physical device, but I am currently blocked by this limit. Any guidance from the community or anyone who has dealt with the same situation would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.Solvedrpnexa2 days agoLevel 1.5: Cupcake322Views0likes11Comments[Survey] End of Year Customer Success Programs Feedback
Hello everyone, As 2025 comes to a close and we look toward a new year, this is often an excellent time for reflection. It has been a busy year, and we've so enjoyed speaking with you and seeing the interact with other community members. The Android Enterprise Customer Success team is dedicated to ensuring that our programs and resources—including the Customer Community, The CAFE, and Advisory Services—are useful, enjoyable, and impactful for you and your teams. As we head into 2026, we’d love to hear directly from you! Would you mind sparing less than 5 minutes (I’ve been assured it won’t take a minute more 😀) to complete our Customer Success Products CSAT survey and share your overall experience please? The survey contains multiple sections for each customer programs. Please only select 'Yes' for the area(s) relevant to you. Your honest feedback is vital and will directly influence the improvements and new features we prioritise. The Customer Community is a collective space, so it’s really important to us that you help to shape the direction. Thank you so much and let me know if you have any questions or thoughts you’d like to share with everyone, below. Lizzie (and the whole AE team) Click the link below to start the survey. (Or to open this in a new tab and display it larger, click here). Loading…Lizzie2 days agoGoogle Community Manager110Views6likes5CommentsIMEI2 becomes the default IMEI with an eSIM.
Hello, On our Ivanti Neurons MDM, we use this API to retrieve IMEIs: getImei() in TelephonyManager is equivalent to: getImei(getDefaultSim()); So when the only sim is inserted in the second slot: getImei() is the same as getImei(1) causing duplication in the report. Ref: https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/base/+/b6587ea/telephony/java/android/telephony/TelephonyManager.java#843 The API used to retrieve IMEIs seems to target getImei(getDefaultSim()), which causes problems with eSIMs that use IMEI2. It therefore retrieves IMEI2 as the default IMEI, which can cause problems with registration consoles such as ZTE, where only IMEI1 is entered. Is there a way to correct this to avoid IMEI swapping? Regards.kEvaR3 days agoLevel 1.6: Donut77Views3likes4CommentsGoogle Account for Android Enterprise gets disabled
Hi all, we use a Google account in our Ivanti Neurons mobile device management system as an Android Enterprise account to manage the android apps and devices. Our account gets disabled with the following message: "Apparently, this account has been used in a way that violates Google's policy." We are unaware of any policy violation and don't know why this happened. At the moment everything is still working in the mdm, but Google says the account will be deleted in june 2026. Is there anyone from Google who can help me with that and can tell me why this happened? I fear that we will have to re-enroll all android devices if the account is deleted and we cannot find another solution to reactivate the Google account till then. I would appreciate any help. Thank you.sbuehl4 days agoLevel 1.5: Cupcake180Views0likes8CommentsPlay Protect is blocking our DPC app — appeal already submitted, looking for guidance
Hello everyone, We are currently facing an issue where Google Play Protect is blocking our Android application during device provisioning. Context: - It is not distributed via Google Play (but is already published); it is hosted externally and installed during provisioning via QR code. - The app is properly signed, and provisioning works at the system level, but Play Protect blocks the app with the message “App blocked to protect your device.” - This started happening recently on new devices / factory reset devices. We have already submitted the official Play Protect appeal form as recommended in the documentation: The form was completed with all required information (APK, package name, signing certificate, use case, etc.). At this point, we are looking for guidance from the community: - How long does it usually take for the Play Protect appeal form to receive a response or decision? - Is there any additional step or channel recommended for Android Enterprise DPC apps in this situation? Any insights or shared experiences would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance for your time and support. Best regardsSolvedrPoyo4 days agoLevel 1.5: Cupcake706Views1like17CommentsDevice financing at scale (10,000+ devices): compliant “restricted mode” on delinquency using Android Enterprise (Device Owner)
Hi everyone, I’m building an Android Enterprise device management solution and I want to keep everything fully compliant (Android Enterprise + Google Play policies). Use case: a company provides company-owned devices to customers under a leasing / device financing contract. We need to manage this at scale (10,000+ devices) across multiple customers/tenants. If a customer becomes delinquent, the company needs a temporary restricted mode (e.g., kiosk/limited access) until the account is back in good standing — with clear user notice, grace period, and contractual consent. What we want to control at scale: enrollment, policy assignment, app allow/deny lists, kiosk/lock task mode, updates, compliance reporting, and remote actions aligned with Android Enterprise best practices. Questions: Is this type of “restricted mode for delinquency” considered acceptable in the Android Enterprise ecosystem when devices are Company-Owned (Device Owner) and the policy is transparent/contractual? For 10,000+ devices, what is the recommended architecture: Android Management API (AMAPI) policies only, or a custom DPC (and why)? For distribution, is the safest path a managed Google Play private app per enterprise/tenant, or another approved approach for large-scale deployments? Any best practices to avoid being flagged by Play Protect / Play policy reviews for legitimate enterprise enforcement features (kiosk, app restrictions, device restrictions), especially at this scale? I’m not looking to bypass security or do anything hidden; the goal is a compliant enterprise solution. Thanks for any guidance or official documentation links.Solvedgustavomartinez5 days agoLevel 1.5: Cupcake72Views0likes7CommentsPlaystore empty after enrollment
Hello, For the past two weeks, we have been experiencing issues during the enrollment of some of our devices. After enrollment, the Play Store is empty and no apps will install. This is a problem that has occurred before, and a fix was provided by Google (link). A case is currently open between our MDM vendor, Ivanti, and Google: link. (issue tracker 399818918) Are other people experiencing this issue? Our vendor has indicated that at least one other customer is currently facing the same problem. Best regardsSolvedFlo5 days agoLevel 2.0: Eclair108Views2likes4CommentsImpact of Google Scribe Changes on Samsung S-Pen Usability in Industrial Contexts
Hello, We have observed a significant change in S-Pen behavior following the integration of Google Scribe into Android 15 / 16 on our Galaxy Tab Active 5. Previously, the stylus allowed cursor movement (or select an write area) within text fields without triggering handwriting input. This was essential for our use case. Our technicians are working in proximity to high-voltage electricity and must wear protective gloves. The stylus is their only means of interacting with the tablet during operations. With the recent change, the stylus now immediately writes in text areas instead of moving the cursor, making it impossible to position the cursor without touching the screen with a finger (which is not feasible in our environment). Before with old firmware (Android 14): https://youtube.com/shorts/RXaPRRXaNcs?feature=share After with latest version of Android with Google Scribe (Android 15/16) : https://youtu.be/ZfKKCKcfxUc / https://youtube.com/shorts/EbuibT211lg This modification introduces a critical usability issue for industrial and safety-related workflows. Is there any documented workaround or configuration option to restore the previous behaviour (cursor movement without writing / select area)? If not, could this scenario be considered for future updates of Android? Thank you for your attention to this matter. Best regards,Aurelien123455 days agoLevel 1.6: Donut84Views2likes7Comments
Explore other customer resources
Help Center
Explore step-by-step how-to guides.
Solutions Directory
Find solutions and partners.
Website
Discover more about Android's features.